Sign in

Solutions

Give agent work a review standard your team can use.

For engineering leads coordinating coding agents, reviewers, and the decisions that move a project toward release.

Get startedBook a demo
Illustrative workflow, not a live workspace result.
Change
Account permission update
Acceptance
Members cannot edit another tenant
Evidence
API access observations
Review owner
Engineering lead

Review

Review the change, not the conversation that produced it.

When an agent and a reviewer work the same file, the requirement, the constraints and the evidence behind the change are already attached to it.

Illustration of a file under review. Your sessions show your own repository.

What changes in your workflow

Code, test output, and approval can live in different places. Symbolic brings their meaning into a project record without treating one as proof of the others.

Review against agreed criteria

Use project gates and requirements to make acceptance explicit.

Keep scope and ownership clear

Evaluate proposed actions with Rules and use Blockers to identify the next available work.

Preserve continuity between agents

Use Handoffs to carry repository state, decisions, and open questions into the next session.

Put it into practice

  1. 01

    Define the review contract

    Name the behaviors and evidence needed for this change.

  2. 02

    Collect the relevant results

    Attach observations from your existing coding and testing workflow.

  3. 03

    Resolve exceptions

    Keep blocked work and unverified claims visible until their owners address them.

Explore the next step

Review accessEvaluate scopePrepare a handoff

Give your next software change a clear acceptance test.

Start with a project, the behavior you need, and the evidence that would show it works.

Get startedBook a demo